Ir al contenido principal

Shareholders Vs. Stakeholders - Round 1

Shareholders are a very important stakeholder for a business as they provide investment sources to the company through equity. However, shareholders must have an attractive rate of return on their investments if they are to put money into a business. Therefore, businesses are shifting a lot of their business focus to shareholder value planning and management. However, what shareholders consider to be successful business performance may not be the same as other stakeholders perceive. In today’s business world, with the ease of stock trading and equity transactions, businesses have shifted to please a shareholder view of value.

For this reason, businesses must consider the consequences of this shift in focus in value-perspective, because it emphasises, some extent, profitability over responsibility and sees the organisations primarily as instruments of its owners. Shareholder value is a vision of measuring business success through assets and capital performance as well as share price, dividends and economic profit.

Shareholders often come in two forms. Long-term shareholders, who are often from within the organisation or those that consider the welfare of the business to be very important and are willing to forgo a little dip in share prices or dividends in order to gain more in the future, and short-term investor, one that has no attachment to the business itself and is looking to only maximise the return. If we take this into account, we could argue that decisions made by this type of stakeholder will not always result in what is best for the company and its employees. This brings up the issue of conflict of interests.

The performance of the shareholders in the management planning used to aim for one dimensional financial goal, such as the RONA (return on net assets) or the ROI (Return on Investment) and the biggest equity for the shareholders, but this kind of objectives leaves at side the interaction between the business and the other parts of the business, like the employees, suppliers and of course customers.
Retail business should consider all the interests of the stakeholders, so as an answer to the needs of the business environment it was created a balance scorecard. When business look for a balance of effectiveness between the organizations mission/business and the operational management, translates a lot of company’s strategic objectives into a coherent set of performance measures increasing the shareholder return over the business.

The balance scorecard balances the external and the internal objectives because it provides an integrated approach to strategic planning. 
The balance scorecard covers all the needs of the stakeholders. Managers select a small number of strategically and relevant indicators that reflect the strategic vision from six different perspectives:
  • Internal business process perspective which looks the capital requirements and what should the organization expect from their staff to demand different goals.
  • Financial perspective which is how shareholders measure success (like the ROE and ROI).
  • Competitive response perspective, which analyses which value the company should develop to achieve success under a competitive environment, this perspective of response of the environment has to work together with the consumer/market response perspective and Learning and growth perspective, because the first one analyses what requirement added value to the customers and the second one analyses what are the creativity and resource characteristics necessary to improve and create value on the customers. 
  • Finally, there is a suppliers and response perspective which considers what the organization should expect from the suppliers and what can the organization offer to the suppliers.
An additional benefit of the balance scorecard approach is that it offers a stakeholders perspective of strategy planning. For many organizations it is crucial that they take their suppliers, employees and shareholders, as well as their customers, into the planning process. A Stakeholder approach permits the trade-off review and leads to optimization which may offer long terms profitability for all members of the value chain rather than short-term profit maximization for one single member.

Compromises do not necessarily need to be made concerning other stakeholders e.g. employees, suppliers and customers.  Retail investors pay close attention to the profit and loss of single stores, presuming that given enough stores in demographically consistent locations, and if each store generates an appropriate percentage of revenue or operating income, the chain will organically create enough money to fund further efficiencies and economies of scale to support general and administrative expenses. 

Comentarios

Entradas populares de este blog

El curioso caso de Aquarius

Aquarius es una bebida isotónica perteneciente a Coca-Cola y que fue lanzada en España hace más de una década. La marca tenía como target a los deportistas que necesitaban una bebida para reponer sales minerales después de hacer deporte y cuyo mercado estaba ocupado principalmente por Isostar y Gatorade, perteneciendo esta última a su rival Pepsico. Pues bien, después de varios años el producto ha evolucionado hasta transformarse en algo que traspasa las barreras del deporte y que triunfa en el canal horeca. De hecho, si se sale a dar una vuelta con un preventista de una embotelladora de Coca-Cola a tomar pedidos, uno se da cuenta de que el consumidor español opta por una poquita variedad de refrescos, pero siempre se encuentra entre ellos Aquarius. La bebida ha llegado al punto de que, cuando estamos enfermos del estómago, algunos médicos recomiendan beber Aquarius para regular el sistema digestivo (desconozco si la marca se promociona en el sector salud de alguna manera). Po...

Cultura, cerveza y Marketing 360

Durante el Master en International Business me enseñaron que a la hora de gestionar la estrategia y acciones de Marketing de una empresa multinacional, es fundamental conocer a fondo las variantes culturales de las zonas en donde tenemos intención de promocionar y vender nuestro producto. También es importante identificar oportunidades que te pueden brindar esas diferencias culturales, como por ejemplo la crema Fair & Lovely de Unilever , muy famosa en Asia, que no hace otra cosa que aclarar la piel. Es justo lo contrario de lo que hacemos normalmente en occidente, que es tratar de oscurecerla a base de sol, rayos UVA, bronceadores… Dibujo de Frits Ahlefeldt - fritsahlefeldt.com Pero no hace falta ir tan lejos para experimentar el choque cultural cuando gestionas el Marketing o las ventas de un producto en distintas zonas. Imaginaros que sois una pequeña empresa española de cervezas artesanas y queréis dar el salto a Italia por ser un país vecino y con costumbres a priori mu...

Muchos cambios, muchas opciones

Casi 7 años han pasado desde que escribí mi último post en Marketismo, y este post es un brevísimo resumen de lo que ha cambiado el Marketing, redes sociales, ecommerce y tecnología desde que lo empecé, en enero de 2011, con un par de conclusiones al final que debéis tener encuenta. Comencemos por la tecnología y dispositivos. Parece que 2011 es antes de ayer pero las cosas han cambiado bastante: en aquel año el iPad estaba recién salido del horno, Blackberry tenía una cuota de mercado muy alta (según algunas fuentes de la época, era líder en venta de Smartphones en España) y se codeaba con Android y Apple gracias a Blackberry Messenger. Whatsapp estaba en sus inicios y permitió conectar por chat todos los dispositivos, incluyendo Blackberry, y eso fue el principio del fin para RIM. Poco a poco los smartphones han ido copando el centro de la vida personal y profesional de todos nosotros, por lo que la tendencia ‘mobile first’ que surgió a mediados de esta década se ha consolidado: c...